Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Biomedicines ; 11(5)2023 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20235859

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its incidence is highly variable. The aim of our study was to describe the radiological and clinical presentations, as well as the therapeutic management, of PEs that occurred during SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of hospitalized patients. In this observational study, we enrolled patients with moderate COVID-19 who developed PE during hospitalization. Clinical, laboratory, and radiological features were recorded. PE was diagnosed on clinical suspicion and/or CT angiography. According to CT angiography results, two groups of patients were further distinguished: those with proximal or central pulmonary embolism (cPE) and those with distal or micro-pulmonary embolism (mPE). A total of 56 patients with a mean age of 78 ± 15 years were included. Overall, PE occurred after a median of 2 days from hospitalization (range 0-47 days) and, interestingly, the majority of them (89%) within the first 10 days of hospitalization, without differences between the groups. Patients with cPE were younger (p = 0.02), with a lower creatinine clearance (p = 0.04), and tended to have a higher body weight (p = 0.059) and higher D-Dimer values (p = 0.059) than patients with mPE. In all patients, low-weight molecular heparin (LWMH) at anticoagulant dosage was promptly started as soon as PE was diagnosed. After a mean of 16 ± 9 days, 94% of patients with cPE were switched to oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, which was a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 86% of cases. In contrast, only in 68% of patients with mPE, the prosecution with OAC was indicated. The duration of treatment was at least 3 months from PE diagnosis in all patients who started OAC. At the 3-month follow-up, no persistence or recurrence of PE as well as no clinically relevant bleedings were found in both groups. In conclusion, pulmonary embolism in patients with SARS-CoV-2 may have different extensions. Used with clinical judgment, oral anticoagulant therapy with DOAC was effective and safe.

2.
Egyptian Journal of Surgery ; 41(1):287-295, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2307203

ABSTRACT

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) elicits thrombotic events, among which acute mesenteric thrombosis (AMT) might be very serious. Patients and methods Eligible patients with AMT who presented to Sohag University Hospital (January 2020-August 2021) were retrospectively studied. Patients were classified into group A (without) versus group B (with) COVID-19. Group B was subdivided into B-1 with mild symptoms and B-2 with peritonitis, all received treatment according to ;damage-control' protocol. Results Fifteen patients were eligible (nine males and six females) with median age of 66 (range: 38-81) years. Group B patients (10) were admitted during the last 35% of the study period (7 months) and exhibited delayed presentation compared with group A (five patients), P value less than 0.05. In group A, three patients with arterial thrombosis underwent laparotomy during which ischemic bowel segments were resected. Two patients had venous thrombosis and recovered under therapeutic anticoagulation. All group B patients suffered from mixed pattern of AMT (arterial and venous). Group B-1 (five patients) received initially anticoagulation, which was successful in two. Peritonitis developed in three, who required either repair of small-bowel perforations or resection of gangrenous segments. All five patients in group B-2 underwent upfront laparotomy due to peritonitis, gangrenous small bowel and colon of variable lengths were found and resected. The overall mortality rate was 33.3% (five patients died). However, death rate was significantly higher in group B (40%) compared with group A (20%), P value less than 0.05. Conclusions COVID-19 triggers aggressive variety of AMT with worse clinical outcome.

3.
Glob Health Med ; 5(2): 99-105, 2023 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2300391

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the world for over 3 years. Treatment options have improved substantially during this period, including antiviral drugs, antibody drugs, immune-based agents, and vaccination. While these improvements have reduced mortality rates in patients with COVID-19, some patients still develop severe illness. In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of treatments for patients with severe COVID-19 from study reports and clinical experience. We discussed the treatments from two perspectives: respiratory care and drug treatments. In the respiratory care section, we discussed the usefulness of high-flow nasal cannula therapy and non-invasive ventilation as an alternative to invasive ventilation. In the drug treatments section, we focused on three classes for severe COVID-19 treatment: antiviral drugs, immune-based agents, and anticoagulation therapy. We did not discuss antibody drugs and vaccination, as they are not used for severe COVID-19 treatment.

4.
Grudnaya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya ; 64(2):145-150, 2022.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2260287

ABSTRACT

Treatment of patients with atherosclerotic lesion of the arteries of the limb is currently an relevance and largely unsolved problem. The severity of the course is aggravated by the presence of numerous risk factors and concomitant diseases, especially at present in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The problem of this pathology has been aggravating the relatively stable course of atherosclerosis for two years, causing increasingly rapid and severe thrombotic complications. A new coronavirus infection dictates the need to review the management of patients with cardiovascular pathology. The paper presents an overview of articles and studies devoted to the treatment of patients with both chronic and acute limb ischemia, who have had a new coronavirus infection. There is also a review of a number of articles devoted directly to COVID-19 and its impact on the human body. The search for articles was carried out on the PubMed Internet resource and affected articles published in the period from January 2020 to February 2022. It was determined that the course of limb ischemia is complicated by coagulopathic disorders and the development of systemic thrombosis provoked by COVID-19. Unfortunately, at the moment there are no approved treatment regimens and the using of anticoagulant drugs that would not only take into account the features associated with infection, but also meet the requirements of safety and efficacy. It only confirms the relevance of the problem. © 2021 Grudnaya i Serdechno-Sosudistaya Khirurgiya. All right reserved.

5.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 296, 2022 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2098345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant treatment is recommended for at least three months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but the persistent pulmonary clot burden after that time is unknown. METHODS: Lung perfusion was assessed by ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) SPECT/CT in 20 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute PE after a minimum of three months anticoagulation therapy in a retrospective observational study. RESULTS: Remaining perfusion defects after a median treatment period of six months were observed in only two patients. All patients (13 men, seven women, mean age 55.6 ± 14.5 years) were on non-vitamin K direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). No recurrent venous thromboembolism or anticoagulant-related bleeding complications were observed. Among patients with partial clinical recovery, high-risk PE and persistent pulmonary infiltrates were significantly more frequent (p < 0.001, respectively). INTERPRETATION: Temporary DOAC treatment seems to be safe and efficacious for resolving pulmonary clot burden in SARS-CoV-2-associated acute PE. Partial clinical recovery is more likely caused by prolonged SARS-CoV-2-related parenchymal lung damage rather than by persistent pulmonary perfusion defects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Embolism , Male , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Perfusion
6.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 116, 2022 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2021317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to COVID-19 related poor outcomes, including thrombosis and death, due to the advanced age, the presence of comorbidities, and the disease and treatment-related immune deficiency. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study conducted by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, including patients from 79 centers across 22 countries. Data collection was conducted between April and May 2021. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for SARS-CoV-2 on nasal or pharyngeal swabs. Severe cases of COVID-19 were defined by hospitalization and the need of oxygen or admission into ICU. Development and type of thrombotic events, presence and severity of bleeding complications were reported during treatment for COVID-19. Bleeding events were classified using ISTH definition. STROBE recommendations were used in order to enhance reporting. RESULTS: A total of 793 patients from 79 centers were included in the study with 593 being hospitalized (74.8%). Among these, 511 were defined as having severe COVID: 162 were admitted to the ICU while 349 received oxygen supplementation outside the ICU. Most patients (90.5%) were receiving thromboprophylaxis. During COVID-19 treatment, 11.1% developed a thromboembolic event, while 5.0% experienced bleeding. Thrombosis developed in 21.6% of patients who were not receiving thromboprophylaxis, in contrast to 10.6% of patients who were on thromboprophylaxis. Bleeding episodes were more frequent in patients receiving intermediate/therapeutic versus prophylactic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) (8.1% vs. 3.8%, respectively) and in elderly. In multivariate analysis, peak D-dimer level and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio were poor prognostic factors for thrombosis occurrence (OR = 1.022, 95%CI 1.007‒1.038 and OR = 1.025, 95%CI 1.001‒1.051, respectively), while thromboprophylaxis use was protective (OR = 0.199, 95%CI 0.061‒0.645). Age and LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration were prognostic factors in multivariate model for bleeding (OR = 1.062, 95%CI 1.017-1.109 and OR = 2.438, 95%CI 1.023-5.813, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLL affected by severe COVID-19 are at a high risk of thrombosis if thromboprophylaxis is not used, but also at increased risk of bleeding under the LMWH intermediate/therapeutic dose administration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Aged , Anticoagulants , COVID-19 Testing , Hemorrhage , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 50(298): 249-252, 2022 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2011302

ABSTRACT

Arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) in COVID-19, similarly as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are observed mainly in severely ill patients. ATE include brain, heart, aortic, and peripheral ischemic complications which usually aggravate a course of the disease leading to lifethreatening conditions. A CASE REPORT: The authors describe a case of a 53-year-old male with Duhring disease in the remission period admitted due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The patient was treated with ceftriaxone (2000 mg once daily), dexamethasone (8 mg once daily), enoxaparin (60 mg twice daily), baricitinib (4 mg once daily), and remdesivir (200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg within 4 consecutive days); he required high flow oxygen therapy. On day 5 of hospitalization, he began to suffer from pain of the right lower extremity; in physical examination the limb was cold with absent femoral, popliteal, and pedal pulses. Urgent computed tomography angiography revealed total occlusion of the right superficial femoral artery (SFA) in the absence of any atherosclerotic plaques in the aorta. The patient was intubated and transferred to department of vascular surgery, where a giant clot was removed from SFA. Unfortunately, the patient outcome was unfavorable due to respiratory failure progression. The authors underline that ATE may occur even in anticoagulated patients and that association of some therapeutic options of COVID-19, like janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors use with an increased risk of ATE, should not be excluded.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Dermatitis Herpetiformis , Azetidines , COVID-19/complications , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Purines , Pyrazoles , Sulfonamides
8.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(8): 1208-1211, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983457

ABSTRACT

A 53-year-old male Japanese patient with COVID-19 was admitted to our hospital after his respiratory condition worsened on day 9 of the disease. With the diagnosis of severe COVID-19, treatment with remdesivir, dexamethasone, and unfractionated heparin was started for the prevention of thrombosis. Although the patient's respiratory status data improved after treatment, severe respiratory failure persisted. Thrombocytopenia and D-dimer elevation were observed on day 8 after heparin therapy initiation. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibody measured by immunological assay was positive, and contrast computed tomography showed pulmonary artery thrombus. The patient was diagnosed with HIT because the pre-test probability score (4Ts score) for HIT was 7 points. Heparin was changed to apixaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, which resulted in a reduction of the pulmonary thrombus and improvement of the respiratory failure. In patients with COVID-19, anticoagulant therapy with heparin requires careful monitoring of thrombocytopenia and elevated D-dimer as possible complications related to HIT. (151/250 words).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pulmonary Embolism , Respiratory Insufficiency , Thrombocytopenia , Thrombosis , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heparin/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/diagnosis , Thrombocytopenia/drug therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy
9.
J Cardiol Cases ; 26(5): 321-324, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956192

ABSTRACT

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is characterized by the deposition of thrombi on the heart valves without bacteremia and predominantly affects patients with hypercoagulable state. Since the lesion of NBTE often exists in the left-sided valves, involvement of the tricuspid valve (TV) is rare. We herein report a 34-year-old woman with advanced ovarian cancer and pulmonary embolization showing NBTE on the TV. Plasma D-dimer level was markedly elevated and echocardiography showed highly mobile masses on the TV with moderate to severe regurgitation. After the initiation of heparin therapy, reduction of plasma D-dimer levels along with shrinkage of the TV vegetations was observed. However, she was forced to discontinue the heparin because its supply was interrupted in association with coronavirus disease 2019. Coupled with systemic metastasis of ovarian cancer, elevated plasma D-dimer level and exacerbation of NBTE were observed. Thereafter, she resumed subcutaneous injection of heparin, resulting in re-improvement. Learning objective: Involvement of tricuspid valve (TV) by nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is rare, especially when they are associated with advanced cancer. Our case underlines the importance of listing the NBTE as a differential diagnosis in cancer patients showing valve vegetations even in the TV.

10.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 15(7): 635-643, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1908641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The present paper aimed to study the available literature on the hypercoagulability state of pediatric patients affected by COVID-19, and the current management of thrombosis in these patients, considering that no guidelines have been published since now in this age group. METHODS: N 244 titles were screened using the selected MESH words, 180 abstracts and 120 full texts were read, 12 articles were included, and four were analyzed by meta-analysis. RESULTS: Over 1128 COVID-19 positive patients, nearly half of them developed inflammatory sequelae, and 7.35% (40 patients over 544 who developed MIS-C) had thrombotic events. Less than 50% of patients with inflammatory disease were under anticoagulant prophylactic treatment, and doses of anticoagulant protocols vary from different centers. Thrombotic events prevented after the start of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy, even if 1.06% (4 patients) died. Only two patients presented complications after anticoagulant treatment, with non-fatal bleeding after UFH treatment. No other complications were reported. No difference in the incidence of thrombotic events between patients under prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and those without was found in meta-analysis (p = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Little is known on the incidence and management of hyper coagulopathy in pediatric COVID-19 infection. Further studies have to clarify this topic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Adolescent , Anticoagulants , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Heparin , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight , Humans , Incidence , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control
11.
Surgery Eastern Europe ; 10(2):270-278, 2021.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1893694

ABSTRACT

This report describes 4 cases of spontaneous retroperitoneal hematomas in the iliopsoas muscle in elderly patients with severe clinical course of COVID-19 infection during anticoagulant therapy. This complication was manifested by nonspecific symptoms, such as anemia, hematuria, discomfort and paresthesia in the lumbar or anterolateral surface of the abdomen, appearance of pain in hypogastrium and, as an extreme variant, hemodynamic instability with symptoms of hypovolemic (hemorrhagic) shock. In the defined clinical cases, the hematoma of the iliopsoas muscle was verified using a number of diagnostic studies (ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs and soft tissues, and/or computed tomography). Establishing the diagnosis of spontaneous hematoma required a temporary suspension of anticoagulant therapy. After conservative treatment, three out of four patients were discharged from the hospital with recovery. © 2021, Professionalnye Izdaniya. All rights reserved.

12.
NMC Case Rep J ; 9: 165-169, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1887060

ABSTRACT

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) typically develops in the supratentorial region in elderly patients. We treated a case of unilateral supratentorial and bilateral infratentorial CSDH, whereby the patient had a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection combined with disseminated intravascular coagulation 2 months earlier. The patient had not experienced any head trauma before the onset of the CSDH. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient experienced no neurological deficit. We propose that we should be aware not only of acute ischemic or hemorrhagic diseases after COVID-19 infection but also of chronic subdural hematoma caused by coagulopathy after a COVID-19 infection.

13.
JMIR Cardio ; 5(2): e27016, 2021 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1547116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the American Heart Association and other professional societies have recommended shared decision-making as a way for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter to make informed decisions about using anticoagulation (AC), the best method for facilitating shared decision-making remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the AFib 2gether mobile app for usability, perceived usefulness, and the extent and nature of shared decision-making that occurred for clinical encounters between patients with AF and their cardiology providers in which the app was used. METHODS: We identified patients visiting a cardiology provider between October 2019 and May 2020. We measured usability from patients and providers using the Mobile App Rating Scale. From the 8 items of the Mobile App Rating Scale, we reported the average score (out of 5) for domains of functionality, esthetics, and overall quality. We administered a 3-item questionnaire to patients relating to their perceived usefulness of the app and a separate 3-item questionnaire to providers to measure their perceived usefulness of the app. We performed a chart review to track the occurrence of AC within 6 months of the index visit. We also audio recorded a subset of the encounters to identify evidence of shared decision-making. RESULTS: We facilitated shared decision-making visits for 37 patients visiting 13 providers. In terms of usability, patients' average ratings of functionality, esthetics, and overall quality were 4.51 (SD 0.61), 4.26 (SD 0.51), and 4.24 (SD 0.89), respectively. In terms of usefulness, 41% (15/37) of patients agreed that the app improved their knowledge regarding AC, and 62% (23/37) agreed that the app helped clarify to their provider their preferences regarding AC. Among providers, 79% (27/34) agreed that the app helped clarify their patients' preferences, 82% (28/34) agreed that the app saved them time, and 59% (20/34) agreed that the app helped their patients make decisions about AC. In addition, 32% (12/37) of patients started AC after their shared decision-making visits. We audio recorded 25 encounters. Of these, 84% (21/25) included the mention of AC for AF, 44% (11/25) included the discussion of multiple options for AC, 72% (18/25) included a provider recommendation for AC, and 48% (12/25) included the evidence of patient involvement in the discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and providers rated the app with high usability and perceived usefulness. Moreover, one-third of the patients began AC, and approximately 50% (12/25) of the encounters showed evidence of patient involvement in decision-making. In the future, we plan to study the effect of the app on a larger sample and with a controlled study design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118270; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04118270. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-21986.

14.
EClinicalMedicine ; 41: 101139, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1433165

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. Limited data exist informing the relationship between anticoagulation therapy and risk for COVID-19 related hospitalization and mortality. METHODS: We evaluated all patients over the age of 18 diagnosed with COVID-19 in a prospective cohort study from March 4th to August 27th, 2020 among 12 hospitals and 60 clinics of M Health Fairview system (USA). We investigated the relationship between (1) 90-day anticoagulation therapy among outpatients before COVID-19 diagnosis and the risk for hospitalization and mortality and (2) Inpatient anticoagulation therapy and mortality risk. FINDINGS: Of 6195 patients, 598 were immediately hospitalized and 5597 were treated as outpatients. The overall case-fatality rate was 2•8% (n = 175 deaths). Among the patients who were hospitalized, the inpatient mortality was 13%. Among the 5597 COVID-19 patients initially treated as outpatients, 160 (2.9%) were on anticoagulation and 331 were eventually hospitalized (5.9%). In a multivariable analysis, outpatient anticoagulation use was associated with a 43% reduction in risk for hospital admission, HR (95% CI = 0.57, 0.38-0.86), p = 0.007, but was not associated with mortality, HR (95% CI=0.88, 0.50 - 1.52), p = 0.64. Inpatients who were not on anticoagulation (before or after hospitalization) had an increased risk for mortality, HR (95% CI = 2.26, 1.17-4.37), p = 0.015. INTERPRETATION: Outpatients with COVID-19 who were on outpatient anticoagulation at the time of diagnosis experienced a 43% reduced risk of hospitalization. Failure to initiate anticoagulation upon hospitalization or maintaining outpatient anticoagulation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients was associated with increased mortality risk. FUNDING: No funding was obtained for this study.

15.
J Res Med Sci ; 26: 63, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1410128

ABSTRACT

Coagulopathy and derangements in the coagulation parameters are significant features of COVID-19 infection, which increases the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombosis, and hemorrhage in these patients, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. In times of COVID-19, special consideration should be given to patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and COVID-19 (CKD/COVID-19 patients) as renal dysfunction increases their risk of thrombosis and hemorrhage, and falsely affects some of the coagulation factors, which are currently utilized to assess thrombosis risk in patients with COVID-19. Hence, we believe extra attention should be given to determining the risk of thrombosis and bleeding and optimizing the timing and dosage of anticoagulant therapy in this unique population of patients. CKD/COVID-19 patients are considered a high-risk population for thrombotic events and hemorrhage. Furthermore, effects of renal function on paraclinical and clinical data should be considered during the evaluation and interpretation of thrombosis risk stratification. Individualized evaluation of clinical status and kidney function is necessary to determine the best approach and management for anticoagulant therapy, whereas there is a lack of studies about the population of CKD/COVID-19 patients who need anticoagulant therapy now.

16.
Stroke Vasc Neurol ; 5(3): 279-284, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1318202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Apart from respiratory complications, acute cerebrovascular disease (CVD) has been observed in some patients with COVID-19. Therefore, we described the clinical characteristics, laboratory features, treatment and outcomes of CVD complicating SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, treatments and clinical outcomes were collected and analysed. Clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19 with or without new-onset CVD were compared. RESULTS: Of 219 patients with COVID-19, 10 (4.6%) developed acute ischaemic stroke and 1 (0.5%) had intracerebral haemorrhage. COVID-19 with new onset of CVD were significantly older (75.7±10.8 years vs 52.1±15.3 years, p<0.001), more likely to present with severe COVID-19 (81.8% vs 39.9%, p<0.01) and were more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes and medical history of CVD (all p<0.05). In addition, they were more likely to have increased inflammatory response and hypercoagulable state as reflected in C reactive protein (51.1 (1.3-127.9) vs 12.1 (0.1-212.0) mg/L, p<0.05) and D-dimer (6.9 (0.3-20.0) vs 0.5 (0.1-20.0) mg/L, p<0.001). Of 10 patients with ischemic stroke; 6 received antiplatelet treatment with aspirin or clopidogrel; and 3 of them died. The other four patients received anticoagulant treatment with enoxaparin and 2 of them died. As of 24 March 2020, six patients with CVD died (54.5%). CONCLUSION: Acute CVD is not uncommon in COVID-19. Our findings suggest that older patients with risk factors are more likely to develop CVD. The development of CVD is an important negative prognostic factor which requires further study to identify optimal management strategy to combat the COVID-19 outbreak.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Cerebrovascular Disorders/virology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Disorders/drug therapy , Cerebrovascular Disorders/mortality , China , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
17.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 20(11): 1044-1049, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-760133

ABSTRACT

AIM: We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, in particular older patients, admitted to tertiary and partner hospitals in Saitama, Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to tertiary and partner hospitals in Saitama, Japan. Twenty-six patients with COVID-19 were categorized into two groups, i.e., older (≥75 years) and younger adults (≤74 years). We evaluated the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory test results, treatments and outcomes of the patients. RESULTS: The majority of the older patients had comorbidities, such as dementia, cardiovascular disease and bone fractures. Comorbidities were significantly more frequent in older patients than younger patients. No association was found between age and body temperature or the incidence of respiratory failure. White blood cell count was significantly lower in older patients (P = 0.018) and the decrease in lymphocytes was greater in younger patients (P = 0.009). Computed tomography (CT) of all patients showed non-segmental, peripherally dominant ground-glass opacities consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. In older patients, antiviral drugs, anticoagulants and anti-inflammatory drugs were administered on a compassionate use basis. The difference in mortality between the older and the younger patients was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients, typical clinical symptoms and blood test changes were often absent; however, CT always contained typical findings of COVID-19, suggesting that CT may be a useful diagnostic tool. Our report illustrates that appropriate treatment, taking patient background into consideration, may improve their condition regardless of age. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 1044-1049.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Age Factors , Aged , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Leukocyte Count/methods , Leukocyte Count/statistics & numerical data , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Symptom Assessment/methods , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
18.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 31: 101186, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-704256

ABSTRACT

Scarce data exist regarding the clinical sequelae of COVID-19 and/or the prevalence of thromboembolic disease in asymptomatic patients. Surely, there is increased prevalence of thromboembolic disease and pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients with COVID-19; hence the administration of even enhanced thromboprophylaxis was suggested. However, the administration of regular thromboprophylaxis in asymptomatic outpatients is an entirely different matter. Herein, we present the clinical story of insidious PE development in two asymptomatic COVID-19 female patients. Issues regarding the pathogenesis of thromboembolism in COVID-19 and the clinical management are equally discussed.

19.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi ; 41(4): 302-307, 2020 Apr 14.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-370588

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the clinical and coagulation characteristics in patients with critical Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and acro-ischemia. Methods: The retrospective study included 7 critical COVID-19 patients with acro-ischemia in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Wuhan, from Feb 4 to Feb 15, 2020. The clinical and laboratory data before and during the ICU stay were analyzed. Results: The median age of 7 patients was 59 years and 4 of them were men. Three patients were associated with underlying comorbidities. Fever, cough, dyspnea and diarrhea were common clinical symptoms. All patients had acro-ischemia presentations including finger/toe cyanosis, skin bulla and dry gangrene. D-dimer, fibrinogen and fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) were significantly elevated in most patients. Prothrombin time was prolonged in 4 patients. D-dimer and FDP levels progressively elevated consistent with COVID-2019 exacerbation. Four patients were diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) . Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was administrated in 6 patients, which reduced D-dimer and FDP rather than improved clinical symptoms. Five patients died finally and the median time from acro-ischemia to death was 12 days. Conclusions: Coagulation parameters should be monitored closely in critical COVID-2019 patients. The timing and protocol of anticoagulation therapy are still under investigation based on more clinical data.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Ischemia/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Humans , Ischemia/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL